Diane Arbus (1923–1971) is considered a pioneering photographer because she radically expanded the scope of what was considered acceptable—and compelling—subject matter in art photography, while also challenging how photographers related to their subjects. Her work in the 1960s and early 1970s broke with tradition in several key ways:

⸻

1. Focus on Marginalised and “Unseen” Communities
• Arbus photographed people on the fringes of society—carnival performers, gender-nonconforming individuals, people with disabilities, and eccentrics—at a time when mainstream photography largely ignored them.
• Instead of portraying them as spectacles or curiosities, she often presented them with directness and individuality, forcing viewers to confront their own biases.

⸻

2. Psychological Intensity
• She was one of the first to make psychological tension a central element in portraiture.
• Her sitters often engage the camera with unflinching, sometimes unsettling, eye contact, creating a sense of intimacy and confrontation.

⸻

3. Distinctive Aesthetic Choices
• Arbus preferred square format (from her Rolleiflex camera) and used a straightforward, frontal composition, rejecting glamour and idealisation.
• She often worked with available light and avoided soft-focus romanticism, giving her images a raw, matter-of-fact quality.

⸻

4. Redefining the Role of the Photographer
• She developed long-term relationships with many subjects, often returning to photograph them repeatedly.
• This approach blurred the line between documentary and collaborative portraiture, influencing later photographers who prioritised connection over distance.

⸻

5. Expanding the Boundaries of “Art Photography”
• At a time when fine art photography often focused on landscapes, abstractions, or “ideal” portraits, Arbus brought taboo and marginalised realities into the gallery space.
• Her 1972 retrospective at MoMA was groundbreaking—critics were divided, but the show cemented her status as one of the most influential photographers of the century.

⸻

In short, Arbus was pioneering because she shifted the centre of photographic attention from the idealised to the overlooked, combining stark honesty with an unflinching gaze that redefined both subject matter and emotional tone in portrait photography.

Here’s how Diane Arbus’s style and themes ripple forward through later photography, from the 1970s to today:

⸻

Arbus’s Influence Timeline

1970s–1980s: Intimacy & Confrontation in Portraiture
• Nan Goldin – Adopted Arbus’s unfiltered, insider view of subcultures (LGBTQ+, drag communities, intimate relationships).
• Mary Ellen Mark – Used Arbus-like empathy and directness with subjects in psychiatric hospitals, circuses, and marginalised communities.

⸻

1980s–1990s: Theatricality & Identity
• Joel-Peter Witkin – Pushed Arbus’s interest in the unusual into surreal, staged, and sometimes shocking tableaux.
• Cindy Sherman – Explored identity and performance, echoing Arbus’s fascination with the personas people construct for the camera.

⸻

1990s–2000s: The Blurred Line Between Documentary & Art
• Rineke Dijkstra – Used the frontal, square-like compositional style to capture transitional moments in people’s lives (youths, mothers, soldiers).
• Katy Grannan – Adopted Arbus’s approach of photographing strangers in their own spaces, often with a similar unsettling stillness.

⸻

2000s–Present: Human Vulnerability & Margins in Mainstream Spaces
• Alec Soth – Combines Arbus’s humanism with American road-trip storytelling, often focusing on people living outside mainstream culture.
• Zanele Muholi – Brings Arbus’s unflinching directness to LGBTQ+ portraiture, reframing marginalised identities with pride and dignity.

⸻

Core Elements Passed On:
• Frontal, direct gaze
• Comfort with discomfort
• Elevating marginalised subjects into fine art
• Balancing empathy with confrontation
• Treating the portrait session as a collaboration, not just observation